Information here will be updated when more details are available and as government regulations affecting ringing are changed. A FAQs section may be added later.


  1. A message from the SACR President – 18th July 2020
  2. Current guidance from the Scottish Episcopal Church (SEC)
  3. Current guidance from the Church of Scotland (Cos)
  4. Guidance from the Central Council of Church Bell Ringers (CCCBR)
  5. Examples of practice where some ringing has resumed in Scotland


A message from the SACR President – 18th July 2020

We all want to get bells ringing again soon because it is a message to the wider world that the Church, in all its senses (and denominations), is alive and active ... as well as being for many of us a physically and intellectually rewarding hobby.  

We are beginning to move out of full lockdown in Scotland, with shops, restaurants, and pubs all now opening, and public worship starting to resume in churches, though constraints on what is permissible are still tight. We are all keen to help protect the vulnerable and avoid spreading the virus, while at the same time trying to reopen the economy and resume activities and hobbies.

It is impossible to avoid all risk and reduce it to zero (even staying in bed has its own dangers), so what this is about is sensible risk assessment and risk management. Many of you will be familiar with these concepts from your employment and work situations. The complication for the Covid-19 situation is in getting a good understanding of the risk impact and likelihood for each individual, and effectiveness of the mitigation factors for every conceivable location and activity.

Scotland is now in Phase 3, with restrictions being lifted at different rates and in different ways to England, which means guidance on ringing from south of the border is not always directly relevant to ringers in Scotland. You will be aware the Scottish government has taken perhaps a more risk averse and cautionary approach. This is where SACR has a role to play, in helping Scottish organizations develop a consistent approach to bellringing activities.

Over the coming weeks, we will continue to see substantive changes in the regulations, and – importantly for ringing – more consistent alignment between different sectors. What we experience in our day to day lives will have to be reflected across all activities – already we have seen this with a rapid bringing forward of opening of worship to align better with allowing indoor access to hostelries.

We should expect a phased return to ringing. It is important we encourage all and any resumption if we can, even if just a few bells for a few minutes linked to specific services, because this keeps bellringing in everyone’s minds, and makes sure we are included in planning for the next steps. If we do not stay fully engaged in the early stages, perhaps because it is not like “normal” ringing or it sounds odd, then we risk being side-lined and having to wait much longer before being allowed more extended ringing and events such as practice nights, peals, and striking competitions.

In trying to restart ringing, however, it must always be clear to all ringers that no one is required to ring, there must be no pressure brought to bear on individuals, directly or indirectly, and they should do so only if they are completely comfortable with the arrangements in place at their local tower. Conversely, just because some do not want to ring should not mean others should be prevented from doing so if it is approved by the relevant authority and they are following the agreed risk management plan.

Decisions about ringing rest ultimately with the authorities owning the bells and towers. Each place of worship is required to carry out a risk assessment and develop risk mitigation plans for each site. The approval process for this risk management plan varies with the organization involved. For example, for the Church of Scotland it goes through the Presbytery chain, and for the Episcopal Church it goes in principle (though probably delegated) through the local bishop. For secular towers, it is going to involve local agencies. This diversity is of course what makes things more complicated in Scotland than the CCCBR advice implies.

Each organization will want to ensure it is acting within what is permitted by the government, but the government regulations and guidance are far from simple or clear. Our largest tower has here – for once – a distinct advantage, in that several bells could be rung while still observing a 2m distance between ringers who are not in the same household. However, many activities such as meals in a café can now be carried out at 1m distancing instead of the default 2m provided a long list of criteria have been factored into the risk assessment.

It is going to take time to get clarity for what this means for bellringing, and it should be expected it will take many iterations. It will greatly help if ringing can be moved to the 1m spacing group, though still not result in normality. From my own university day-job experiences with trying to work out teaching room capacities and timetabling, where the same issue is crucial, I know that trying to get meaningful engagement with government agencies on such details is slow, difficult, and stressful, and bellringing is not quite as important as the higher education sector.

None of us is an expert in this unprecedented situation. I would like us to work together, and share information and experiences, as we move forwards. We need to remain calm and respectful, even when we might be frustrated.

Colin North
SACR President



Current guidance from the Scottish Episcopal Church (SEC)

At the end of June, SACR was able to engage with SEC to help them formulate their advice. Phase 3 guidance for resuming worship produced by the Scottish Episcopal Church can be found here:

In amongst the lengthy advice, in section G. Other Matters, there is this explicit item on bellringing:

12. Bellringing: bellringing activities may resume in Phase 3 but subject to physical distancing, the observance of good hygiene practice and the Scottish Government restrictions on the number of households permitted to meet indoors. General guidance on bellringing developed south of the border is available at:-

Please note that that guidance has been developed in England in the light of the UK Government’s approach to lockdown easing in England. In Scotland the Scottish Association of Change Ringers has issued advice in May to its members on safety and maintenance regarding bell towers. Any further advice issued by SACR should be available from its website:

The safety and maintenance guidance mentioned here was that produced by our Bells and Towers Advisor, as shown at the AGM in May and circulated to towers afterwards.



Current guidance from the Church of Scotland (CoS)

Bellringing is notable by its absence from the CoS guidance updated yesterday on their website. This is therefore a priority for SACR, to get bells factored into their processes. More details to follow.

Their advice is here:

The problem for us is possibly having to deal with many individual presbyteries. I am working to open a dialogue with a central point of contact at General Trustees in Edinburgh (using names on the above web page). All suggestions for specific named contacts gratefully received, email please to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.



Guidance from the Central Council of Church Bell Ringers (CCCBR)

This guidance was developed for the Covid-19 regulations that apply in England, and primarily for the Church of England bells and towers:

Whether we like it or not, those responsible for bells in Scotland such as Church authorities are probably going to look at these guidance notes, which is why we also need to be aware of them. The CCCBR has a size (and name) that, rightly or not, will carry some weight. For example, SEC make reference to them but also (see above) makes it clear these are not the be-all and end-all.

In its present form the CCCBR advice is definitely not acceptable in Scotland because it is working on a distancing that is smaller than – currently – allowed here. Despite this, we need to accept that, at least initially, the CCCBR guidance might be taken as a starting point and then be adapted to the Scottish context. We need to be ready with specifics if we wish to deviate.

In my communications, I am already making it clear that SACR is much better placed to speak for Scottish bellringing than CCCBR. Nearly every bell-ringer in Scotland is a member of SACR, and every tower in Scotland with a set of bells rung full-circle for change ringing is affiliated. We thus have direct contact with all those who make bell-ringing happen in Scotland.

SACR is working to establish its own lines of communication to give us the chance to make sure advice and risk management are appropriate for Scottish bellringing and adapted to Scottish regulations. If you have specific contacts of relevance here, please email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to pass on this information.

As and when we have more detailed advice, it will be added to this website.



Examples of practice where some ringing has resumed in Scotland

To help us all to develop our own risk management plans and have helpful discussions with our local authorities, we will put here examples of the procedures being followed in cases where ringing of some kind has resumed at Scottish towers.

If there is ringing now in your tower, please will you get in touch with This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  to discuss sharing your experiences and risk assessments to help others.

For steeple keepers, SACR has already circulated some guidance (as presented at the AGM) on checking bells for maintenance, safety, etc. ahead of any resumption of ringing. If you are a steeple keeper and need further information, please email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Upcoming Events